Medium Format is the bee’s knees for film shooters. It’s where you can shoot film and rival the image quality from digital files, while retaining the signature lower contrast film look. And did you know that 6×7 is the designated press and artist’s format! This article extensively discusses your 6×7 options!
What’s the deal with 6×7 medium format?
The format was dubbed ‘The Ideal Format’ back in the 1960s and 1970s and that name stuck for a long time. But why?
Well, the aspect ratio of 6×7 centimeters and 4×5 inches, or 8×10 inches for that matter, is similar. Where 4×5 inch was the entry level size for quality work for a long time, 6×7 aimed to take that position from sheet film by on the one hand offering the ease of use of roll film while at the same time reducing costs for film and developing, and on the other hand allowing people to make the switch without having to set up all their equipment and photographic paper stocks anew. 6×7 centimeters allowed people to carry on in the tradition of photographers like Edward Weston (who only shot 4×5 inch briefly before upsizing to 5×7 inch), press photographer Weegee and even Ansel Adams. That was both the practical and the economical aspect.
But, what about the aesthetics aspect? Well, we’ve seen already that with similar aspect ratios, it was easy to pass 6×7 frames off as 4×5 inch or even native 8×10 inch shots and also pass yourself off as a fine arts photographer along the way. But what is the relevance of that in modern times? Those of us that come from the era of film photography and prints are used to seeing the 2:3 aspect ratio of Leicas and the 1960s-onwards SLR cameras, APS-C and ‘full frame’. Also, the relatively young Micro 4/3 cameras have 3:4 aspect ratio. None of those are quite the 6:7 aspect ratio. Same time, the wildfire of smart phone aspect ratios nowadays greatly erases that in younger generations. They grow up with the 16:9 wide angle aspect ratio of their TV or smart phone screen…
And apart from all this, Medium Format 6×7 is also a heck of a lot bigger than regular 35mm negatives. Leading to less enlargement for big prints, which translates to better sharpness in prints. That’s the quality aspect of choosing 6×7 centimeter as your format.
How to distinguish yourself amongst all those shooters and images? How do you stand out from the crowd? Well, there’s the square format from the Rolleiflexes and Hasselblads. Personally, I’ve always found it hard to create interesting and enticing compositions in square format. I love Rolleiflexes but to be honest I s*ck at shooting them. There’s no way to sensibly apply the Rule of Thirds or the Golden Ratio in creating a composition with a square image. As a result, my images often are boring when I shoot square format… Oh well.
So, when you want to stand out with not only the image content but also its dimensions, 6×7 (or 4×5 inch or 8×10 inch) is the logical choice. And honestly, the 4×5″ and 8×10″ large formats are very very nice and offer ridiculous resolution and sharpness as well as very limited depth of field if you need it, but they are more cumbersome to handle and all your expenses go up as well.
So, 6×7 it is. For me.
OK then, what’s to choose from?
And why then isn’t everybody shooting it, you might ask?
Well, there are currently no new cameras on the market that can deliver this aspect ratio. The most recent camera that can do it is the Fujica GF670. It’s a folder rangefinder, and it debuted in 2010. And although its image quality is pretty spectacular, it’s expensive. Actually, 6×7 centimeters is a thing of the past in camera production. The ‘Ideal Format’ seized to be ideal to the camera buying masses, and therefore is less than ideal to be produced at all.
This means your options are limited to models that were sold as long as 50 years ago, although most 6×7 cameras are much younger than that.
When getting into 6×7 medium format, your options are limited anyway. There weren’t even that many models made over the years. In fact, there were so few models made that this article can cover most of them, and that’s what it does!
When the above has got you wondering on what your options are, read below where you can find the majority of affordable 6×7-capable cameras in just three tables.
Medium Format Rangefinder Cameras Comparison | Fujica GM670 | Mamiya 7 & 7-II | Plaubel Makina 67 & W67 |
2018 Typical Prices with Standard Lens and Back | $550 with the 100 f3.5 non-AE lens |
|
|
Dates of Manufacture | 1974 – ??? | 1995 – 2012 |
|
Appox. Dimensions and weight |
|
|
|
Standard Lenses |
|
|
|
Optional Lenses |
|
|
none, fixed lens |
Lens Mount | Bayonet mount, identical to Fujicas 690 models. | Bayonet mount, identical for 7 and 7-II. | None |
Film Formats | 6×7 roll film, both 120 and 220. | 6×7 roll film, both 120 and 220. | 6×7 roll film, both 120 and 220. |
Movements | none | none | none |
Focussing System | Rangefinder with lens. | Rangefinder with lens. | Rangefinder with lens. |
Viewfinder |
|
Rangefinder coupled
Automatic parallax compensating Readout shutter speed LED indicator |
Rangefinder coupled Automatic parallax compensating |
Shutter | Leaf shutter built in lenses, cloth to shield the film from light when changing lenses. | Electromagnetic full flash synch leaf shutter. | Leaf shutter. |
Shutter Speeds | B, 1 sec. – 1/500 sec, but the 100 AE has a slowest speed of 1/8th. | 4 sec. – 1/500 sec., B, X synchronization at all speeds | 1-1/500th, B, syncs at all speeds |
Backs | None | None | None |
Close-up Accessories | For the 100mm lenses only. | Cumbersome attachment for the 80 f4.0 lens that requires the lens to be set to 1 mtr exactly, and provides correct focus at 10.8 inches only. Tripod use required. | None |
Repair Sources | Phase One | ||
Miscellaneous Features | all lenses have 72mm filter threads. | ||
Further Information | This Camerapedia article covers the GM670 as well. | Mamiya Leaf Legacy 7-II page.
If reading lens comparisons is your thing, try this one |
Camerawiki article with excellent history. |
Personally, I’m a sucker for press gear. It’s the epitome of cool, those beat-up, hard as a rock cameras that churn out excellent images despite the technical flaws they acquired on the job, because the shooter has the skills and the guts to get in the thick of the heat and shoot the heck out of it. So, press cameras in 6×7 are here!
Medium Format Press Cameras Comparison |
Graflex XL |
Koni-Omega |
Mamiya Press |
2018 Typical Prices with Standard Lens and Back | (XLRF) $???; (XLSW) $??? | (Rapid 200) $??? | (Super 23) $??? |
Models |
|
|
|
Dates of Manufacture | 1965-?? | (1954) 1965-1978? | 1962?-?? |
Appox. Dimensions and weight | ? | Rapid M:
Rapid 200:
|
Super 23:
Universal w/o pack film adapter:
|
Standard Lenses |
|
|
|
Optional Lenses |
|
|
|
Lens Mount | Bayonet | Bayonet mount with breech-lock; pin coupling to rangefinder (wide angles couple by default) | Bayonet-mount lock buttons (except Super and Universal: bayonet locking ring) |
Film Formats |
|
|
|
Movements | None | None | Swinging back (15deg, 4 directions), additional 1.19 in (30.1 mm) extension on Super, Universal |
Focussing System |
|
|
|
Viewfinder | Direct:
Combined with rangefinder:
|
Direct:
Combined with rangefinder:
|
Direct:
Combined with rangefinder:
|
Shutter | Leaf in-lens shutter | Leaf in-lens shutter | Leaf in-lens shutter |
Shutter Speeds | B,1-1/500, sync at all speeds | B,1-1/500, M/X sync at all speeds | B,1-1/500, M/X sync at all speeds |
Backs |
|
|
|
Close-up Accessories | ? | Close-up lens/attachment | Extension tubes, back extension |
Repair Sources | Ed Romney has written books about how to fix just about any camera you can think of, including the Graflex XL. | Greg Weber used to repair them? | Mamiya Professional Systems Handbook, Robb Smith, 1974. |
Miscellaneous Features |
|
|
|
Further Information | Charles Trentelman’s article on the Graflex XL
Complete XL Line overview here |
Karen Nakamura’s article on the Koni-Omegas.
Koni Rapid Omega 2004 page by Robert Monaghan |
? |
So there are some of us that prefer to see in the viewfinder just what’s going to be in the frame, and what not. Like, a 100%. If you’re that kind of shooter, you need an SLR in 6×7 since it will allow you to look through the lens when shooting. Luckily, there’s some options here for you too.
Medium Format SLR Cameras Comparison | Pentax 67, 6×7, 67-II | Mamiya RB67 & RZ67 | Bronica GS-1 |
2018 Typical Prices with Standard Lens and Back |
|
|
|
Dates of Manufacture |
|
|
1983 – ?? |
Appox. Dimensions and weight | |||
Standard Lenses | SMC Takumar 105 f2.4 | Sekor 90 f3.8 |
|
Optional Lenses | Find a full list of all lenses here |
Really too many to list here, please refer to the links below! |
|
Lens Mount | Bayonet | Bayonet | Bayonet |
Film Formats | 120 and 220 | 120 and 220, Polaroid | 120 and 220 |
Movements | none | none | none |
Focussing System | Viewfinder & lens |
|
Ground glass or viewfinder w/ lens |
Viewfinder | Chimney finder or several prism finders | Chimney finder or several prism finders | Chimney finder or several prism finders |
Shutter | Cloth shutter | Leaf shutter in lens | Leaf shutter in lens |
Shutter Speeds | 1-1/1000th, B, syncs to 1/30th only | Depends on lens. typically 1-1/400th, T (has no B mode!), syncs at all speeds | |
Backs | Fixed back, can be ‘hacked’ to take Polaroid but irreversible |
|
|
Close-up Accessories | Any diopter filter will do | Both cameras focus with a bellows and have additional macro rings available | |
Repair Sources | |||
Miscellaneous Features | Rotating backs | TTL flash | |
Further Information | Karen Nakamuras article on the Pentax 67 series
67ii page on RicohImaging |
My article on the Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD
Full RB67 overview on Camerawiki Full RZ67 overview on Camerawiki |
Camerawiki article on the Bronica GS-1 |
In the final ‘Odd-ball’ category I have accumulated some cameras that are affordable and get you into 6×7 pretty cheap. And yes, there’s a list of expensive options too but I decided not to research those fully, instead list them below. So if you’re looking to burn cash rather than save it, look below the ‘cheap options’ Odd-ball table! Sensible folks read on slowly, it’s about the image, not about how much you spent to shoot it, right? 😉
Medium Format ‘Odd-ball’ Cameras Comparison | Horseman Convertible 842 | Hacked Baby Graflex 6×7 | Horseman VHR etc |
2018 Typical Prices with Standard Lens and Back | $550 |
|
|
Dates of Manufacture | 1971 – ?? | 1940s to 1970s |
|
Appox. Dimensions and weight | Very lightweight! | ||
Standard Lenses | 62mm f5.6 fixed lens | Kodak Ektar 101 f4.5 | Topcor 105 f4.5 |
Optional Lenses | None | As many as you can get cheap |
Many of these lenses are also found marked ‘Topcor’, for the 970 Press and 980. |
Lens Mount | None | Lens on lens board | Lens on lens board |
Film Formats |
|
|
|
Movements | None | None | Limited front rise, swing and tilt and rear swing and tilt (On the VH and VH-R) |
Focussing System | Lens only | Rack and pinion w/ rangefinder | Rack and pinion w/ rangefinder (not on VH) |
Viewfinder | Wire Frame only! | Wire frame, top mounted viewfinder | Top mounted viewfinder, parallax corrected |
Shutter | Leaf shutter | Leaf shutter on lenses, but the Baby Pacemaker has a cloth shutter and allows for the use of non-shuttered lenses! | Leaf shutter on lenses |
Shutter Speeds | 1-1/500th, B, syncs at all speeds | depends on the lens you fit | |
Backs |
|
Get a Graflex Singer back for either 120 or 220 film. Remove the original leaf springs and the ground glass. Fit new black velvet around the rear opening to light proof it. Use the screw holes from the springs to mount extended studs. Fit the back in place and use rubber bands over the studs to secure it in place. Presto! A removable 6×7 back on a Baby Graflex! The rangefinder might need a bit of recalibrating with the new velvet, use the ground glass for that. |
|
Close-up Accessories | |||
Repair Sources | |||
Miscellaneous Features | It has a flash sync and can take a cable release…? | ||
Further Information | My article on this remarkable camera | There were similar Horseman models produced as early as 1948, I have listed the most common models here.
VH-R page on Camerawiki 980 page on Camerawiki |
Need to spend a fortune?
Get your kicks below, there’s a number of options that break the bank to acquire but darn I gotta say there’s some nice stuff in there for sure!
- The youngest camera is the Fujica GF670, also known as the Voigtländer Bessa III. The 2008 rangefinder folder with Fujinon EBC lens.
- The Horseman SW612 and SW612P models. The very versatile panorama camera line-up, the offspring of the above listed and rather unknown Convertible 842.
- Linhof Technika Press 70. Basically a Graflex XL or a Mamiya Universal but hey, it says Linhof…
- Alpa 12TC, from the remarkable camera makers from Switzerland. Did you know they make an adapter that allows to use Pentax 6×7 lenses on their cameras?
- The Fuji GX680 system used to be one of the best systems you could buy into but while parts of the system are still expensive, you have to make an effort (i.e. spend money) to find fully functional lenses and bodies. Buying a complete set where everything can be tested would be smartest, but most pricy too…
6×7 is not 6:7 proportion. The 6 in 645, 6×6, 6×7, 6×8, 6×9 … refers to the width of 120 film, which is 6cm wide. However, the rails to keep the film flat means the actual width of exposed film is ~56mm, so 56:70 is the same as 4:5, although most 6×7 cameras do not have 70mm long frames and are usually just a little bit shorter. That is why 6×7 was called “ideal format”: you can print on 8×10 paper without cropping.
Fully agree, Michael!
But, as so often in photography, focal lengths, dimensions and aspect ratios are approximate and I’ve chosen to keep my wording in line with the common phrasing. The way the image transfers to paper is indeed also a reason to dub it ‘ideal format’, and rightfully so!
Lawlor refers to the “film gate.” Though the width is fairly fixed, the length or the larger number varies slightly from maker to maker within the description 6 by “6” or “7” or “9.” So, yes, the image proportions and the named film gate size are closely related.